Home › Digital Repository › Faculty, Staff and Student Publications/Presentations › Undergraduate Research › Undergraduate Research Day › Undergraduate Research Day 2010 ›
The Confidence Table as an Improvement in Classification
Object Details
View
Title Information:simple
The Confidence Table as an Improvement in Classification
The Confidence Table as an Improvement in Classification
Name:Personal
Angela Schanke Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
Angela Schanke Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
Name:Personal
Jennifer Weatherford Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
Jennifer Weatherford Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
Name:Personal
Dr. Steve Bieber Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
Dr. Steve Bieber Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator
typeOfResource
text genre
Powerpoint/PDF
Origin Information
Place
Laramie, Wyoming
University of Wyoming (keyDate="yes")
4/24/2010
Laramie, Wyoming
University of Wyoming (keyDate="yes")
4/24/2010
Language:Text
Physical Description
born digital
born digital
abstract
Discriminant analysis was developed by R. A. Fisher in 1936, where he classified three varieties of iris plants based on physical features. To create his classification table, the posterior probabilities of each outcome are calculated and are somewhere between zero and one. These decimals are rounded to the nearest whole number. A confidence table does not do this rounding, but maintains the decimals to calculate how likely it is for an event to happen. We created random data to test whether the confidence table is more accurate than the classification table. We used groups of two, three, four, and five and found discrepancy of about ten to fifteen percent between the tables. Rounding the probabilities gave the illusion of having more accurate results. To further test our hypothesis, we used real data from a political survey. Over a thousand people were surveyed on thirty issues. The average bias was about eleven percent between the tables, with the confidence table being more accurate. Though there was some bias in the confidence table, it was likely the result of computer algorithms finding patterns that do not exist. In general, it was much more reliable than the classification table for predicting outcomes. note
From - Undergraduate Research Day 2010 - Celebration of Research - Abstracts
Subject
Undergraduate Research Day
Undergraduate Research Day
Related Item:series
Title Information
Undergraduate Research Day 2010
Undergraduate Research Day 2010
Location
(usage="primary display")
http://hdl.handle.net/10176/wyu:539
http://hdl.handle.net/10176/wyu:539
accessCondition:useAndReproduction
http://digital.uwyo.edu/copyright.htm
Record Information
languageOfCataloging
:Text(ISO639-2B)
English :Code(ISO639-2B)
eng
English :Code(ISO639-2B)
eng